Where will the world go?
Where will the world go?...If all the world's biggest organisation's have their exponetials dictated only by global accountants, economists of externalities and financial speculators -measuring only what can be taken out every 90 days and never investing in compound exponentials? This question applies systemically to the globalisation we evolve and every molecule of globalisation. (Jargon words for this systemic view include holons or macro & micro). So our inquiry interconnects all people who want to organise or make a difference - whether our exploratory focus is:• What is the deepest learning curve you invest in?• What do your family and community invest in most intimately?• What do the globe’s largest corporations or industry sectors believe in compounding?• What do governments of places (nations or regions) develop?• What does nature or the commons need invested in top keep life-forms healthy?Bill Clinton Invites 1000 Leaders to Join an Action System Initiative Predicated by 2 Overall Values. In my life now I am obsessed with only 2 things:• I don't want to see anyone die before their time. • And I don't want to see good people spend their energies without making a difference...You can change the reality of the world by systemic actionThe Wars Between Goodwill & Badwill NetworksSustainability’s key question “which system exponential is this locking us into?” takes on ever greater urgency as this century’s biggest innovations – networks, globalisation etc – are all “systems squared” constructs where exponential attract and compound each other’s type. Sustainability or not to be: has become the most valuable criteria every person can measure trust-flows around any living system’s gravity. As Chairman Ray Anderson of Interface:Everyone’s view of decision-making and performance changes if they see the whole’s valuation trajectory. Sustainability mathematical frame is appropriate for governing any investment system through time: corporation, industry sector, community or regional investment, career learning curve, a profession’s integrity, the impact of a type of media, the health of a natural system like fresh water etc. Moreover, network models involve sustainability of systems squared, cubed … so that for example one of the defining challenges of our generation is to map whether globalisation of any life critical value exchange is sustainable at every locality it integrates. Once more, we echo Ray's enelightening view: to believe that sustainability is not profitable is to be suffering from a measurement blindness on what all people value most.
Where will the world go?...If all the world's biggest organisation's have their exponetials dictated only by global accountants, economists of externalities and financial speculators -measuring only what can be taken out every 90 days and never investing in compound exponentials? This question applies systemically to the globalisation we evolve and every molecule of globalisation. (Jargon words for this systemic view include holons or macro & micro). So our inquiry interconnects all people who want to organise or make a difference - whether our exploratory focus is:• What is the deepest learning curve you invest in?• What do your family and community invest in most intimately?• What do the globe’s largest corporations or industry sectors believe in compounding?• What do governments of places (nations or regions) develop?• What does nature or the commons need invested in top keep life-forms healthy?Bill Clinton Invites 1000 Leaders to Join an Action System Initiative Predicated by 2 Overall Values. In my life now I am obsessed with only 2 things:• I don't want to see anyone die before their time. • And I don't want to see good people spend their energies without making a difference...You can change the reality of the world by systemic actionThe Wars Between Goodwill & Badwill NetworksSustainability’s key question “which system exponential is this locking us into?” takes on ever greater urgency as this century’s biggest innovations – networks, globalisation etc – are all “systems squared” constructs where exponential attract and compound each other’s type. Sustainability or not to be: has become the most valuable criteria every person can measure trust-flows around any living system’s gravity. As Chairman Ray Anderson of Interface:Everyone’s view of decision-making and performance changes if they see the whole’s valuation trajectory. Sustainability mathematical frame is appropriate for governing any investment system through time: corporation, industry sector, community or regional investment, career learning curve, a profession’s integrity, the impact of a type of media, the health of a natural system like fresh water etc. Moreover, network models involve sustainability of systems squared, cubed … so that for example one of the defining challenges of our generation is to map whether globalisation of any life critical value exchange is sustainable at every locality it integrates. Once more, we echo Ray's enelightening view: to believe that sustainability is not profitable is to be suffering from a measurement blindness on what all people value most.
posted by ... at 3:49 PM
0 comments
